> Yes. There's already a pretty good tradeoff: do I spend hero points
> on a temporary bump (even if it's an augmentation that lasts for a
> contest), or do I spend them on permanent improvement? There never
> seem to be enough to go around.
With respect, anecdotal "there is no problem" assertions seem inappropriate in the context of a rules discussion list, in the context where someone has expressed (anecdotally or otherwise) disquiet with the very "not a problem" rule in question.
However traditional or popular.
Powered by hypermail