> > OTOH, if Big and Small are a measure of how well
> the
> > hero (or dog) can apply those properties (which
> seems
> > more HW-like)
>
> That's how I understand HW abilities: how well you
> can apply the
> thing in a contest.
Oh, good. So the intuitive "of course a human is bigger than a Jack Russell!" may even be wrong. Somehow. Because humans are generally better at applying the abilities they have than animals. Which *may* explain the rather odd numbers in the Rooster.
Powered by hypermail