>Why are wounds seen as specific to combat. (I think it was wulf who seemed
>to suggest they are).
No, No! My discussion was on combat as a reply to a query on Shield
Breaking, but I agree entirely, ANY permanently (within the contest)
debilitating effect envisaged by a successful attacker in an Extended
Contest (ie using AP) can be represented using Wounds.
>So during a legal argument my opponent can apply his 7AP victories as
>'wounds' against my ability to argue that continues to apply for the rest of
>the case - perhaps by showing that I am not qualified to speak in the court
>or that I am in breach of the formal rules of the court.
Lovely example, very fitting. I have a Ulerian Initiate with a good
Sarcastic Put-Down skill - I leave it to you to figure what wounds she
inflicts :)
>Combat should not be a special case - thats the key point of HW surely.
I thought the key point was kicking the lousy Chaos-loving Lunars out
of Dragon Pass? Or is that just me?
Wulf
Powered by hypermail