So, the final result is marginal victory for the V's (the best result for the opponents). It has more sense, but it's a bit strange for me.
> Now, I wouldn't allow this at all. I'd rule that Harold loses his
>6 points (leaving him at 19W). V1 as the highest number would make
>the roll, but augmented by V2 and V3, for a total of +5. So that
>would be 19 vs 15.
That's a good idea.
> I would make each attack a seperate roll (5W vs. 10, 2W vs. 5, 19W
>vs. 19).
with separate action points biddings isn't it?
Regards,
Antonio
Powered by hypermail