Re: Question about non-humans and Puma People

From: Dave Camoirano <DaveCamo_at_...>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:19:05 -0400


On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 07:34 AM, Alex Ferguson wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:22:50PM -0400, Dave Camoirano wrote:
> > No.
> >
> > What Jeff said is accurate: it's not a talent.
> >
> > You're correct when you say it's unclear. Nowhere in the Puma
> > description does it say it's a talent. It is not a common magic
> ability
> > and not learned but something that they can just do. This is also why
> > they don't suffer the inherently difficult magic hurdle.
> You may want to look up "innate magic" in the rules before making this
> sort of 'clarification';  see my earlier post on this topic.

I did. Several times.

p. 104: "any magical ability *whose nature is not specified during character creation* is assumed to be a talent"

The middle section of that sentence is key. There's *nothing* in the rules that say you can't specify that a magic you were born with is not common magic.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Powered by hypermail