wrote:
>> Actually leopards and (and jaguars) are much more closely related
to
> either than to puma. (In Glorantha, who knows? GL/4-world
taxonomy may
> bear little in the way of resemblance to the RW sort.)
>
> > Not sure if I'm seeing your complaint, sorry.
>
> Not sure I am either. I thought I was pedanting, not complaining.
>
> C,
> A.
I guess I've lost the ablity to tell somewhere along the line. =(
Time for a vacation, I think.
Bye,
Jeff