On Sunday, October 26, 2003, at 04:42 PM, Paul Andrew King wrote:
> > > >I do not see him changing tack as "ignoring the psychological
> damage" -
> >> >more on this in a moment.
> >>
> >>Again it is not the issue of "changing tack" as the nature of the
> >>change. The way I see it the most likely situation is the
> >>psychological equivalent of being "thrown to the floor". He's got to
> >>recover from that before going on an all-out attack.
> >
> >Based on what? There has been no description of a specific effect that
> >would be equivalent to "thrown to the floor". What has the trooper
> done
> >that would force the GM to make this interpretation?
>
> Do I have ot keep repeating this ? Based on how the attack is
> supposed to work.
And how is the attack "supposed to work"?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Powered by hypermail