Not exactly - it's the situation as described in the narrative. That has to reflect and explain the AP situation so they are related, but it's the narrative that matters. Let me say it absolutely clearly, if the action makes sense given the narrative then I have absolutely no objection to it,
>
>On the other side they seem to think that they determine how close the
>contest is to coming to a conclusion, at which point limitations may be
>placed on the characters actions dependent upon the goals of the contest.
I'll let them explain their views. I'm not sure that that is it.
>
>Is this the fundamental of the argument?
>
>I'm trying to strip away the dross overlaying the actual argument...
-- -- "The T'ang emperors were strong believers in the pills of immortality. More emperors died of poisoning from ingesting minerals in the T'ang than in any other dynasty" - Eva Wong _The Shambhala Guide to Taoism_ Paul K.
Powered by hypermail