On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:25:08AM +0100, Bruce Ferrie wrote:
> I haven't, but I *have* told a couple of players to take a new ability at 17
> when it deserved to be based off the keyword. I can only remember what one of
> them was offhand - it was a Talk About The Weather ability to be based off a
> British keyword.
I think that comes under the category of 'egregious omission'. :)
OTOH it rather reminds me of my usual hobby-horse of 'keyword' vs.
'described' ability ratings... :/