What a great epiphany ). I see the light!
All my players are using fine/heavy/masterwork weapons/armour/shields... so if that is the base line then why not ignore it.
Essentially everyone comes with the equipment they need to do their job, a warrior has appropriate equipment by default. So the real difference can easily be replaced by their function and their quality.
A heavily armour spearmen fighting a lightly armed skirmisher... heavy vs light, give him +3.
A rich warrior vs a poor one, give him +3.
This gives an extra use for Wealth as a rating as well. A wealthy person will have the best equipment, so Wealth could be used as an augment, setting a base line of average (17). So Wealth 22 (5 over 17) might give you +1 over an average person in some cases.
Elite unit vs average unit, their equipment will be better, give them +3 on top (note that an elite unit doesnt mean it is better trained, quite often elite units had more money spent on them, got better equipment etc. A veteran unit might easily defeat an elite unit due to skill).
The other advantage of this idea is that magical weapons become more powerful. A Spear of Sharpness might have been +3 (spear) +1 (Fine) +2 (17 magic sharpness) = the magic component was 1/3rd of the power of the spear. By eliminating the base line the spear becomes a +2 spear and much more valuable.
Essentially you replace equipment with a quality rating, based around average. Poor units have poor quality materials (usually) and might be at -2. Good uits have good equipment and might get +2.
The added advantage is that you also remove the starting player having fighting skill 5w and then adding +10 for weapons and armour immediately, pushing your games baseline starting skill into the 10w area before you even begin.
Great idea )).
Powered by hypermail