Cool. I'm just trying to get a feel of what I think works here. It seems most people think
that "lateral advancement" makes sense in some cases, maybe with some modifiers
depending.
LC
On 21 May 2004 at 10:13, David Dunham wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me. (One could argue that hunting for the rock > is different than having it, and give a -5 penalty so that the new > relationship starts at 3W.)