Re: Re: Transforming abilities

From: Light Castle <light_castle_at_...>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:13:39 -0400

Cool. I'm just trying to get a feel of what I think works here. It seems most people think that "lateral advancement" makes sense in some cases, maybe with some modifiers depending.


On 21 May 2004 at 10:13, David Dunham wrote:

> Sounds reasonable to me. (One could argue that hunting for the rock
> is different than having it, and give a -5 penalty so that the new
> relationship starts at 3W.)

Powered by hypermail