> Question, warrior attacks (10M) scholar, scholar defends with combat
> skill (17). When the scholar attacks he uses his bemuse with
> irrelevant facts(1M2)! Warrior defends with bloodthirsty 17. The
> scholar wins thus, the guy gives up trying to kill him. Would you
> allow that scenario in a game?
Personally, I'd *encourage* that scenario in a game!
Though I'd also encourage the scholar's player to actually tell us what
those irrelevant facts were, even if he does have to come back to us next
session with a suitably inspired answer.