Re: Re: Mastery notation

From: Bruce Ferrie <bruceferrie_at_...>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:17:15 +0100


> Mark Galeotti <mark_at_...> wrote:
>
>(OK, I know theoretically we could be dealing with a
>dozen masteries, but on the whole not)

Put my vote down for not changing the order of the notation. Newcomers to HQ find it confusing enough without having the notation method change from book to book.

Changing the symbol you use for Masteries is fine, but not this, I think. It's like deciding that you'll change the order you alphabetise the index in so that all vowels are placed together or some such. It sounds nice and logical, but it just makes things confusing.

Regards,

Bruce

Powered by hypermail