Re: Re: Mastery notation -- from the Continuum list, was: MG's Thoughts on Continuum 2004

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: !!!!!!> Visit the Search Engine of Lhankor Mhy <!!!!!!

From: Dread Domain <dreaddomain_at_...>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:48:10 -0400

Yup! I also prefer the actual notation. I wouldn't mind Guy's alterations but at least keeping the same order would avoid confusion.

Awaiting Mythic Russia with great anticipation...

Original Message ----- From: Guy Hoyle To: HeroQuest-rules_at_yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 6:49 AM Subject: Re: Re: Mastery notation -- from the Continuum list, was: MG's Thoughts on Continuum 2004

I prefer the existing notation, with one change: where a character has 1 mastery )19w), make note of that (19w1). That's a bit more consistent IMO. Heck, why not make it 19w0 when they have NO masteries?

I guess that's 2 changes.

Guy