> Possibly one of the character's keywords could work. That
> character has the "warrior" keyword; I think one could argue
> that "warrior" should include "first aid", at least with an
> improvisational penalty
This seems likely to me, yet the keyword does *not* have "first aid". Does this mean that the designers overlooked it, or that for a Heortling warrior, first aid is beneath them and the omission is intentional?
Perhaps more helpfully, I seem to remember being told that using a skill as a defence does not count as "active", even if it's the primary skill being used. Is that right, and does it help?
Personally I still have terrible trouble visualising the difference between "active" and "non-active" use of a skill from the point of view of the character. As a rules-construct, yes, easy, but in-game?
Powered by hypermail