RE: Re: The book says many things

From: Mike Holmes <homeydont_at_...>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:57:37 -0600

>From: "bankuei" <Bankuei_at_...>

>But yeah, its that lack of examination into alternate methods of running
>stuff that is the
>cause of the lack of documentation on it.

So, again, you must be saying not so much that there was a lost opportunity, as that there is a style implied by the book that's unsupported by the examples, right? No fault of the authors (that would be like blaming Newton for not having thought to write about Relativity). Just a simple observation of circumstance. I don't think that's controvesial to anyone.

So, any rules ramifications of this?

Mike

Powered by hypermail