> > So no, concentrating on Common Magic isn't a renunciation, because
> Common
> > Magic (while it might be considered juvevanile/for emergencies only/a
> > poor-man's magic) is part of every pantheon.
>
> Rich
>
> Isn't this in conflict with what described as the Gloranthan 'norm' in
> his article on the Gloranthan website about concentration? Folk don't
> tend to concentrate so they don't end up excluding useful magic like
> there 'Heal Hurt' talent they learnt off mother when they were young?
> Or am I reading you wrong?
Yes, the majority of Gloranthans *don't* concentrate. But *if* you concentrate in Common Magic, it's not the same as leaving your pantheon/church/tradition, because common magic is included (at a very base level, usually) in all culture's beliefs.
We've already established that not only is this person concentrating (making him part of the Minority of Gloranthans), but it is in Common Magic (which is, imo, by far the smallest part of that minority).
RR
C'est par mon ordre et pour le bien de l'Etat que le porteur du pr�sent a
fait ce qu'il a fait.
- Richelieu
Powered by hypermail