And I must go to sleep soon, anyway. :)
> You misunderstand (of course, you're making me try to remember my thought
> proceses for a 3-week old conversation...).
And for that I apologize.
> After all, digging in your saddlebags for something is specifically listed
> as "unrelated", even if what you're digging for is the Holy Handgrenade of
> Antioch. So you can use an "unrelated action" to set up for a AP swap in a
> later round.
Which makes sense.
> Frankly, if there is a 2nd ed. and I'm involved in it, I'll be advocating
> that the whole notion of "related" and "unrelated" actions get scrapped.
> Actions can swap APs, can set up bonuses or penalties for the contestants,
> might do a special effect, etc., but it's all meant to further the contest.
Now I could probably get behind that. Would you scrap the wounding rules, then? (Drop the 7ap for a -1 and just offer a "hit to wound" idea as a set up a penalty roll?)
LC
Powered by hypermail