RR:
> Your missing the fact that you are not supposed to
> roll on this number. It
> would only ever be modified from, not *ever* used
> as-is. That's why it's "0"w2.
>
> If you convert it into non-mastery notation, yes, it
> is 40, which would then
> translate back to 20w, but that's not the point of
> the exercise.
Or to look at it another way, if you use it alone, you're trying to roll less than or equal to 0. You can't. So you fail - don't bother rolling. Those two masteries then bump the fail to a critical. Always, every time. (Yes, possibly it was a fumble bumped to a success, but do we care?)
Yahoo! Photos is now offering a quality print service from just 7p a photo. http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Powered by hypermail