Re: QW - apparently arbitrary rules

From: Camo <DaveCamo_at_...>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:57:41 -0400

You are correct that the follower is an extension of the hero, mechanically. But only mechanically. The follower is still an independent entity even if he acts in the control of the hero. In what story do we ever see the follower doing heroic deeds?

Camo

On Mar 31, 2007, at 7:49 PM, L.Castellucci wrote:

> Except the follower is really just an extension of the hero,
> mechanically. So
> why not let it bump when it is a follower's attribute? (I see the
> logic, but
> it seems thin.)
>
> LC
>
> On March 31, 2007 07:39 pm, Camo wrote:
> > The thought here was that bumping is for heroes. If a follower could
> > bump, they wouldn't be a follower, would they? :-)
> >
> > Seriously, if a hero is depending so much on the skill of a
> follower,
> > he isn't much of a hero!
> >
> > In any case, it was not arbitrary. The focus should be on the
> heroes,
> > not on their followers.
> >
> > Camo
> >&#92;
>
>