On Mar 31, 2007, at 7:49 PM, L.Castellucci wrote:
> Except the follower is really just an extension of the hero,
> mechanically. So
> why not let it bump when it is a follower's attribute? (I see the
> logic, but
> it seems thin.)
> On March 31, 2007 07:39 pm, Camo wrote:
> > The thought here was that bumping is for heroes. If a follower could
> > bump, they wouldn't be a follower, would they? :-)
> > Seriously, if a hero is depending so much on the skill of a
> > he isn't much of a hero!
> > In any case, it was not arbitrary. The focus should be on the
> > not on their followers.
> > Camo
Powered by hypermail