I like keeping the old APs kicking about. It means whoever has got the lower number of APs is still at a major disadvantage in terms of what they can do without sticking their necks out.
They're on the ropes and need something special to pull them out of the hole (to mix metaphors).
Cheers,
Ash
>
> --- "L.Castellucci" <lightcastle_at_...> wrote:
>
> >
> > I pretty much agree with Ashley here. It's a
> single
> > contest. Now, in the case of extended,....
>
> Agreed about the problem of situational v. AP shift,
> and let me add another that I've never settled to my
> satisfaction. You're changing abilities all the way
> through, we agree on that. But the first one you use
> determines your AP for the rest of the contest. If
> you
> start off with something that's appropriate for the
> aims then, but you're not that good at, you're
> handicapped later on, when you're using your main
> skills (appropriate now), but still have only the
> measly few APs you started with.
> A reason, to my mind, to use chained simple rather
> than extended, simply because it means you no longer
> have to think about either of these problems.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Powered by hypermail