From: markmohrfield <markmohrfield_at_...>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:23:46 -0000
wrote:
It's a great disappointment to me that future
> supplements look to be all either supporting RQ or HQ2-style play. Of > course, I can (and will) adapt them, but that's going to be a bunch of > work, and I can't help but feel left out in the cold by the HQ2
approach.
>
Surely HQ 1.0 and 2.0 aren't so disimilar as to make it that difficult
to convert between them? I think we may be making mountains out of
molehills here.