> I object to an ability being limited to augment only, not to an *use* of
> an ability being augment only.
>
> i.e. - "You can only use your whetstone as an augment." I would object
> to this as pointless.
> "Your whetstone is probably most often going to be used as an augment
> to your sword attack." I would be fine with this as it doesn't prevent
> me from using the whetstone directly when it is an appropriate ability,
> such as for a contest about sharpening something.
>
> Is that any clearer?
>
> LC
>
>
>
Powered by hypermail