Re: Re: Augment-only stats

From: L C <lightcastle_at_...>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:20:19 -0500

Not at all. I object to something being augment only, that's why I asked if people found it useful. That is the only example we have of one, as far as I recall.

I find it a redundant and unnecessarily rules-y solution to a problem that doesn't exist, since the distinction is clearly drawn with the "cannot produce extraordinary effects" clause.

LC

Todd Gardiner wrote:
>
>
> But, if I recall, you real objection is against making rune affinities
> augment-only in order to describe Common Magic in a manner that is
> distinct
> from Initiate Magic and Feats.
>