Re: Most pointless rule contest.

From: Alex Ferguson <abf_at_...>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:00:13 +0100 (BST)

> But why should that be pointless then? Sorry, but I don't follow. A
> target number of 19 _differing_ from a 20 is very desirable, not pointless.

And as I've pointed out: the same rule _simultaneously_ obliterates the distinction between 20, and 1W, which without the '20 rule', _would_ have been different. So to return to my original question, why bother?


Powered by hypermail