Re: Re: knacks; multiple

From: Alex Ferguson <abf_at_...>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 16:22:02 +0100 (BST)

> > > Rather, I can see a problem in case A acts against B *and* C.
> >
> > Since this is not possible under the HW rules, a bit of a non-problem...
>
> And how do *you* interpret the "Attacking Multiple Targets" rules on p.140?

With great difficulty, without the benefit of an index. ;-)

OK, amend to 'extremely inadvisable, under the HW rules'...

Cheers,
Alex.

Powered by hypermail