>So why should one opt to attack (or, rather, act against)
>multiple adversaries rather than taking them one at a time?
I agree entirely, I always felt that this was a sub-optimal solution. It may be worth it if the opponents have big offensive edges, you might want to wipe them all out in a single blow. However, the rules are strictly non-simulationist, so having a tactical choice like this available goes against the grain.
Philip Hibbs http://www.snark.freeserve.co.uk/ Opinions expressed may not even be my own, let alone those of any organisations, nations, species, or schools of thought to which I may be affiliated.
Powered by hypermail