Me:
> >I'd think that losers would do this continually, given the option.
> >It would indeed normally be a much slower way to lose a fight,
> >if it's headed that way anyway. You might want to consider a
> >similar rule as a defender option, at a less 'favourable' ration,
> >maybe.
Mike Cule:
> A suggestion from someone who hates Action Points, if you'll accept it:
>
> Have the option for the defender be at a lower number of APs, five or
> six to make it clear that letting yourself get wounded is a desperation
> tactic.
The degree of desparation seems marginal here: I was thinking of more more like 2 or 3, myself. (Off the top of my head -- well, not quite, but not remotely analysed, playtested, discussed, etc.)
Cheers,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail