Re: slings and arrows ...
> From: philip.hibbs_at_...
>Subject: Re: slings and arrows ...
>>IMO ithis is better captured by the fact that they
>>get N attacks against you rather than that your
>>arguments are at a disadvantage against them.
>The fact that they get more "attacks" is irrelevant. It doesn't matter who
>attacks who, unless there are edges or handicaps involved. The advantages
>of having many people on your side are multiple opponent penalties, which
>we are talking about dropping, and the extra APs.
Good point (though having to reduce 6 arguments to 0 or a larger AP pool is
still a big disadvantage). I think the original discussion was about
multiple target penalties (i.e., penalties for attacking several targets in
a single exchange) not multiple attacker penalties (-3 per extra attacker).
I might waive the former for an appropriate argument that targets 2 or more
opponents, but not necessarily the latter.
Powered by hypermail