Re: Feats and their Descriptions

From: abohlig_at_...
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 01:04:44 -0000


> ...Insert much droning about the merits of ambiguity vs.
specificity in feats...

I'm happy enough either way when it comes to things my players do or would like to "invent". What I would appreciate is more structure around published materials. I fear some authorial intent is lost when there are no descriptions.

Supporting references:
Narrators 168: "Smoking whip" - ??? what's that?

N- 140/141 - Very nice. Some of these ("Command") are obvious enought that it probably wouldn't be necessary, but the others add nice descriptive touches that will definitely enhance the fun of play.

Perhaps we could use the files or database function to add favorite feat definitions?

A

Powered by hypermail