> While I was favouring the definition: attacker = winner of the
> exchange and is seperate from
> the actor in an exchange I pulled the following definition of the
> glossary on the web site:
>
> "Rank: Comparative rating assigned to a piece of equipment, usually
a
> weapon or armor. During combat, the difference between the
attacker's
> weapon rank and the defender's armor rank is applied as an edge or
> handicap to the attacker's AP bid."
> at the crux of this argument. Perhaps Roderick or Robin would like
> to clarify this so we can move on.
Actually, having argued this through and seen plenty of discussion pro and con, I'm happy with the situation (apply weapon & armour Rank/Edge either way according to exchange result), even if only for a House Rule (assuming you are too, Andy). I also have increased my Refute ability :)
Wulf
Powered by hypermail