Re: some skills questions

From: Tim Ellis <tim_at_...>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 10:14:06 -0000

wrote:
> > eg Sing 17 is better than Entertainment (actor) 17, which is
> > probabaly better than Entertainment (mime, juggler) 17.
>
> There is an implication here that the more sub-abilities, the more
of
> an improvisation modifier there should be on the use of the main
> skill whereas I would suggest that it's irrelevant how many sub-
> skills there are.

I'd agree, that wasn't that I meant to imply at all. What I meant was that someone with "Actor" might be a more accomplished singer than someone who specialises in non-verbal entertainment.

someone with Entertainment (Play whistle, Play harp, Recite Poetry, Tell Story) would probably have less of a penalty for singing than someone with Entertainment (Fire eater)!