Subject: Re: Digest Number 217

From: t.s.baguley_at_...
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:34:12 +0100


> From: "Steve Dempsey" <eg0sum_at_...>
>Subject: Re: Digest Number 217
>
>>
>> Personally, I think the core HW rules work fine, but a few desirable
>> (bordering on essential in some cases) improvements would be:
>>
>> - better augmentation table/penalties (several fixes suggested on
>> this list work fine)
>
>Perhaps some altruistic soul who has followed this group from the
>start might make a comprehensive list of these fixes, so I don't have
>to trawl through 5,000ish mails.

>From memory:

  1. apply penalties to the augmenting ability not the augmented ability (I use this and it makes people wary about augmenting one feat with another from the same affinity)
  2. ignore penalties for all except either fumbles (or fumbles and major defeats)

These (I think) were the most common.

Thom

Powered by hypermail