>
> Mikko:
> >>Silly because the whole point of the argument is that we just
> >>don't know what in general a Thunderstone is.
> Mikael:
> >In general we *do* know what a Thunderstone is. It is a Stone
> >with the power of Thunder. You're worrying about details.
>
> And, as someone has already pointed out, it's explained in the first
> paragraph of the Hedkoranth writeup.
But the thunderstone was used here as an example. It does happen to be explaned later, most aren't.
-Adept
Powered by hypermail