Re: Taking a shot at Eurmal...

From: Mikko Rintasaari <mikrin_at_...>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 16:50:01 +0300 (EET DST)


On Tue, 5 Sep 2000 philip.hibbs_at_... wrote:

> >Isn't sensuality too, uh, civilized
> >for the Eurmali. How about sedduction?
>
> Why mince words, why not call it "sex"? Seduction has implications that
> normal persuasive methods are used... not very trickster-like. "Impersonate
> lover" isn't a seduction power, but could fit under "sex", as could
> "enlarge member", "remove genitals", "self-gratify", and any number of
> amusing or horrifying abilities, many unpublishable.

Ah, that's quite ok too. I've just gotten used to the idea of Eurmal the Sedducer, since it's a traditional trickster thing to do.

Eurmal the sexmachine is ok too, but remember that Eurmals feats tend to backfire amusingly (or horribly, depending on who you ask).

        -Adept

Powered by hypermail