Re: Digest Number 277

From: Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley_at_...>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:40:17 +0100


> From: "Wulf Corbett" <wulfc_at_...>
>Yes, but my point is, when loaning AP to your ally, the enemy's
>abilities, armour, edge, atc. are ignored, despite the fact that you
>are supposed to be shooting at them. Therefore, ALL the AP loaned to
>an ally are usable by the ally, whereas AP bid for a direct attack
>are adjusted for defensive edge. Not that I dislike the whole idea by
>any means, but this seems peculiar.
>
>Wulf

I don't think it is a problem. This seems the best way to modeling distraction etc. in close combat too. Lesser fighters might be better off harrying their opponent, taunting them and so on to improve the primary attacker's chances.

Thom

Powered by hypermail