> >I mean, Truesword Stoke, to me, sounds like it would grant the devotee a
> >single sword stroke that is guaranteed to hit, Humakt guides his sword for
> >the one killing blow, or something like that.
>
> >Not exactly sure how you'd mirror that in game terms.
>
>Require a suitably high number of APs for the augment and if the
>PC loses the exchange, interpret the results as meaning something
>other than a miss ("Your sword's aim is unerring as always, but
>the outlaw used his shield to take most of the blow...").
Just realized I was talking bollocks. It should have been "Require the PC to go for a high augment or edge (ie if he asks for a +4 edge, tell him the magic effects more powerful than that) and if the PC loses _an_ exchange in the following combat, interpret..."
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail