> On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:21:06 +0100, Richard Melvin
> <rmelvin_at_r...> wrote:
>
> >Hmm, do you have non-illusionist PCs in your games?
> >
> >Do they feel perhaps a bit left out?
>
> We haven't even got an Illusionist yes, she's in the design stage
:)
I
> do agree, the rules I created are powerful and open to abuse. Using
> them to, as you say, fetch supper, would be excessive & wasteful.
I'm
> working on limitations & adding difficulties (like the AP
requirement
> when initially casting). But nonetheless I think the basic idea does
> work.
>
> Wulf
I would point out that requiring AP expenditures forces any usage to
being an extended contest or to be no penalty at all. My own opinion
is that the rules are remarkably powerful and on the far side of
playablity as there seems to be little downside, but I think others
have (and will) comment on it...
Jeff