Re: Magic and Mundane

From: Michael Hitchens <m.hitchens_at_...>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 15:25:11 +1100 (EST)


On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Craig Dodge wrote:

>
> Michael said:
> > The problem becomes even more obvious if you compare two Humukati with the
> > same experience. Let's take 8 sessions (32 HP again). They start on 5w
> > combat and 17 affinites
> > Humakti 1 spends 27 on combat and 3 on affinity (who knows what he did
> > with the other two), giving him 2w2, 18 and 17
> > Humakti 2 sends 8 on combat and 24 on combat affinity 1, giving him 13w,
> > 5w and 17.
> >
> > My money is on #1. Which does't sound right to me.
> >
>
> But which is more interesting to play ?
>
> In my books its #2

Oh, I agree completely. But not every play will. And a narrator may want some means of keeping this under control. I know when I start running HW (which I hope to in January) I'll have the limits on multiple advances I outlined as a house rule.

Michael

Powered by hypermail