Re: Digest Number 374

From: Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley_at_...>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:42:57 +0000


> From: Kmnellist_at_...
>Subject: Re: troll iron
>I am not sure anyone else would agree with you. I would make sense, if
>enchanted iron were not poison to trolls, for them to have and use enchanted
>iron armour, for example. I am, however, positive that trolls would not be
>able to wear iron armour without a SERIOUS rash developing. There has never
>been any evidence of troll use of enchanted iron, even though they are
>pragmatic enough to use what's good for them.

A great troll in the WD scenario "Lair of the White Wyrm" (correct name?) has an enchanted iron Greatsword. Having said that, armour is somewhat different!

>I am probably in a minority, but I think if you can't be obstreperous and
>rude on mailing lists then where can you? Almost no chance of getting a punch
>on the nose, and instant tension release when you read soemthing and think
>"bah! that's wrong!".

I've found relatively little intentional rudeness here (some rashness, annoyance, frustration etc.).

Thom

Powered by hypermail