Re: Sundry rules questions for demo

From: Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley_at_...>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:24:48 +0000


> From: Andrew Dawson <asmpd_at_...>
>Is this something new? According to HW:RiG p. 26, either of the two
>abilities may be a keyword. This is followed by a more explicit description
>that includes primary and secondary keywords.

I though it was a house rule developed by many groups in parallel. Possibily, it was in one or more draft rules. AFAIK all the examples are one keyword + one other ability. I adopted this rule, partly because it produces slightly more interesting followers.

Thom

Powered by hypermail