> >The affinities is really the same thing and do not change. What
> >does change is the _target_ of some of the feats. A clan chief
> >that becomes a tribal king might have to learn new feats to invoke
> >his tribal powers but he does not lose any of his old powers.
>So what you're saying is that it's really one affinity, but with two
>names and two sets of feats? And the newly crowned king doesn't forget
>his old feats?
Yuppo. That's the basic impression I get from the statement that they provided two magic keywords but warned the distinction between the two was artificial.
> >Why? Rex is for tribal kings only.
>Really? I've always thought tribal kingship was just a _minimum_
>requirement.
Not for being a High King. The Princes of Sartar were not tribal kings.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail