> From: wulfc_at_...
>Isn't CC 17 a bit high for the Fyrd? That's Professional Warrior
>level. Shouldn't the Fyrd be lower, 13 sounded right to me?
>Additionally you'd have a dozen or so Warriors at CC 17+ with decent
>armour, of course. Fyrdsmen are farmers, not fighters, right?
>
>Wulf
I think Jeff meant 17 including augments - which seems OK to me.
Thom