> Yes, but all the feats of Uralda for example are about cows. If Uralda
> doesn't get a improvisational penalty for blessing cows etc. then why
> should they purchase feats with their hardearned heropoints, when the they
> get no penalty not using them?
>
> I know that this isn't what they meant when they wrote the rules. That's
> why I suggested adding something to the errata.
"A worshipper of Esrola never suffers an improvisational modifier when using the affinities on her subcult animal or plant." at the top of p. 204 should be understood as "A worshipper of Esrola never suffers an improvisational modifier when using the two Esrola affinities on her subcult animal or plant." Or perhaps some other sentence entirely, making the idea even clearer.
But please note the use of the definite article "the" in front of "affinities" in that sentence. It would be clear enough in French (not in English IMO) that this refers only to the two basic affinities, but not the third affinity gained from the subcults.
But you're a Finn, right ? No definite articles as such in Finnish ? Can't help.
I agree. One for the errata.
cheers,
Julian Lord
Powered by hypermail