Re: Re: Biggest man in the Tula

From: Roderick and Ellen Robertson <rjremr_at_...>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:18:09 -0700


> > I'd probably allow it if it was the 5W, though I'd point out that
> Huge
> > would have accomplished the same thing with fewer words. I wouldn't
> be
> > at all happy with Biggest Man in the Tula 13.
>
> I think it would be cool. I'd just compare it against the opponents
> highest appropriate ability, Large or Tall, maybe even Strong unless
> I had reason to believe the NPC was meant to be short and beefy.
> Towers Over People would do. Apply suitable improv penalties and let
> the character demonstrate whether they are walking the walk or
> talking the talk the hard way. GM's could make a characters life
> hell by forcing them into a roll they are likely to lose and then
> needling them about it (seeing as we're into confessions of GM
> malice).

It's a delusion until proven otherwise :-)

RR

Powered by hypermail