Nils:
> > > Ah! With this theory I'd say he is a giant spirit, not a god.
> >
> > So would it be hopelessly mis-stating things to say Ratuk's
> > worshippers
> > were "functionally hsunchen", at least to a first approximation,
> > though not of hsunchen historical origins?
>
> Today, I guess you could say that, but the case is still
> open on whether the Ratuki themselves think that.
There's no reason to suppose they would; their principal categories of people would be "us" and "prey", and "landlubbers".
> As mentioned before, I don't know if they think, hsunchen-like, that
> they have shark-souls in human bodies.
I suppose it's fair to say that "hsunchenism" could be: a) a historical origin; b) a magical practice; c) a self-identification; or indeed d) some combination of some or all of the above.
> We know there are tribes who have stopped being hsunchen,
> but is there any precedence for a people who are not
> descended from the original fiwan _becoming_ hsunchen?
First time for everything... Then again, they may have been descended from the fiwan, then "forgot" this identity, becoming largely theistic, only to later rediscover this. (Just a thought.)
Cheers,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail