Re:Humakti again

From: Dougie <dougiepunk_at_...>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:52:16 +0100


just to add to the post I've just sent, I'm not suggesting that their are no DEATH wielding, abortion causing, emotionless killing machine type nutters who worship Humakti, just that they aren't all (by along shot IMO) like that...

Cheers,

Dougie.

"Do you want to make it impossible for anyone to oppress his fellow-man? Then make sure that no one shall possess power."  [The Political Philosophy of Bakunin, p. 271]

> >To give up family and clan ties in Heortling
> >society is such an extreme thing that only an extremist of some form
> >would do it IMO.
>
> But if the Humakti re-sheaths he can pretty much carry on as-was but he
but
> doesn't have to worry about his family having to be responsible for his
> actions (IMO this responsibility falls on who-ever hires the Humakti e.g.
> chieftain, mercenary commander etc.who effectively take the place of
family
> in legal matters)...
>
> I really do think (IMG, IMOHO etc.) that a humakti can sever his family
> ties as a formality and a legal get out clause only, but still live with
his
> family, have a bit a nooky with suitable members of whatever sex he
fancies,
> turn up at his mums for family get together and generally be a relatively
> normal member of society albeit with various ritual roles and
> responsibilities and a convenient legal position for a soldier .... (I
know
> others will disagree with me here ;)).
>
> Dougie.
>
> "Do you want to make it impossible for anyone to oppress his fellow-man?
> Then make sure that no one shall possess power."
> [The Political Philosophy of Bakunin, p. 271]
>

Powered by hypermail