And this is bad? YGWV encourages thoughtfulness and inquiry into Glorantha, including questioning of the canon.
My point is that if you take the honor out of Humakt, he becomes a lot less interesting and a lot less fun. I'm not saying this to shout other opinions down, but to provoke thought, elicit different opinions and hopefully learn something new myself.
I believe the existence of broo Humakti (at least on army-sized scale) is highly problematic because either 1) you have to get a lot of broo to behave honorably (whatever that means), or 2) you take the honor out of Humakt. How you do either is an interesting question for discussion.
Reinier> one of the things that makes Humakt so >interesting is this
tension between honor on the one hand and death> >on the other.
>
Metcalfe> In the Sartarite religion, yes. But their interpretation of
> honor is _not_ intrinsic to Humakt and He's quite free to
> differ elsewhere.
How so? Are you saying honor is not intrinsic to Humakt, or a certain kind of honor isn't?
Metcalfe>For this reason I see little point to saying> on this group that Chaotics can't join Humakt given that> they can
I didn't say that; the opposite, in fact.
Powered by hypermail