Maybe we can convince Mark that the Unspoken word needs an Esrolian issue :-)
Me:
> >J Hughes suggested that violent aspects of male
> >gods would be rejected by the Ernaldans following their experience
>>in the Helm & Sword war.
John
> Did I say Ernaldans? That was in the Esrolia post, right? I thought
> I said Esrolians. I sure *meant* Esrolians:
I've probably just horribly misquoted you. Apologies.
> (In the Digest's absence we seem to have colonised the HW list with
> digesty digressions. The difference between the two lists are
> becoming less and less. Should we take this over to the GD?)
GD does seem to be back. Would anbody feel left out if we moved the debate to the GD. One intersting angle of debate here, at the moment, is that Greg can comment, but we may have got too deep now.
Ian
Powered by hypermail