> Yes indeed! Those examples are excellent, and have been used to
> illustrate what kind of people Humakt's deciples are to the player in
> question.
>
> I just meant "bad guys" as in "heretical enemy Humakti". After all it
> doesn't take a very large difference in Humakti dogma for the swords to
> come out.
True that. I think the fact that Carmanian Hum'akt as written doesn't have Honor as an affinity is something to base heresy on. For Orlanthi, that honor part is cruicial.
> > >But is torture ok? What about messing with the undead?
> >
> > Torture is an attribute of Ikadz and thus unhumakti. Undead
> > is false death and also unhumakti.
> Even for the dark-side of Carmanian Humakti? What does the dark side
> include then, and how does it differ from the light side?
The whole Light vs Dark thing in Crmanian culture I've never gotten a handle on. At first I thought they were at war, The Good Light god vs the Bad Dark God, but then some things I read make me think that isn't so at all.
Personally, I don't see why torture would be unhumakti for humakti where honor wasn't important. Mind you, it does seem non-combat and they do seem to be more combat oriented. But there is the whole "you only see the true man when you lean him over the pit of death" philosphy, which I could see being humakti in a certain way.
LC
Powered by hypermail